The language translation industry has become a booming profession for linguists and freelancers. It has opened a wide spectrum of possible employments and career opportunities that have catapulted translation as a well-paid profession. Statistical machine translation works by tools. Yet there are challenges that seem to undermine this growing industry’s rise to the job hierarchy. One of these major issues is the imminent proliferation of automated translation programs and technology that, some people say, may replace the job of human language translators.
Automated translation or human language translators?
Automated language translation and machine translation does help in providing translation needs to businesses or individuals but not as human translation can. Some of these tools are so pricey that they may cause translation agencies to shell out a fraction of their investment. These tools may even prove to be efficient in delivering outputs at a most convenient and speedy manner that it often negates human intervention along the translation process. This may be where the real issue may arise.
Because these tools are dependent on databases, memory, and internal systems, some statistical machine translation components may be left out. For instance, there are target languages that require a certain level of sensitivity and awareness of cultural differences that can be done by human translation very well. Interlingual Machine translation cannot sometimes detect this, and so the aid of a human linguist is required for original sentences. There are words and phrases that possess unclear nuances which when translated by neural machine translation often lose, if not been altered, its contextual meaning. Automated machine translation systems cannot just be as effective as human language translators in terms of getting the right contextual translation.
Statistical Machine translation systems and other similar automated translation tools can deliver results at the less possible time. It can be quite beneficial in this way because the results of source documents are received immediately, and the business can focus on some other opportunities and tasks. If we are to scrutinize these results, however, we may most likely discover that what was translated actually were just words – never the concept. Neural Machine translations are not programmed to translate concepts, but human translation can. Human translators are equipped with mental faculties that allow them to translate original sentences and grasp conceptual knowledge. The freedom with what the human brain is capable of translating is as limitless as there is water in the ocean.
Furthermore, automated translations and artificial intelligence are not capable of adding a personalized human touch to a translation. Machine translators cannot do a job as similar human translation. The basic difference between reading a machine-translated statistical methods source document and one that was done by a human linguist is evident in that results show a dramatic contrast in style and appeal. Human translators tend to create a translation that captivates the audience, giving it more appeal and receptive qualities of the target language. Statistical machine-translated content tends to become dry and drab, often resulting in an extremely straightforward and literal translation from the original text of the target language.
The future of translation
The future of content and digital translation is certainly among human language translators of target languages. Statistical machine translation does not bring the emotions and connectivity of words as compared to human translators. Interlingual machine translation is an objective reality that is now not in demand. Several key components are simply not attainable for these automated and statistical machine language translation. Statistical Machine translation software can only accomplish so much compared to the endless possibilities the human translator can do. This gives businesses a higher level of confidence in human translators because the localization focus of the translated content becomes more appealing, engaging, and truly comprehensible for a target market in a global perspective. Rule-based translation with deep approach in-depth knowledge is required to do the translation good. The quality of machine translation and google translate is very different from a professional translator.
What do you think? Will Interlingual machine translation ever beat humans at translation in terms of quality? Let us know your thoughts.
Human Language Translators
Despite the unperceivable advancement in technology, You just can’t download food from your tablet, PC or a mobile phone. Technology may seem to be boundless but it has its limitations. You cannot depend on Statistical Machine translation software for translating the target language. Interlingual machine translation is a mere machine not equipped with much in-depth knowledge. Therefore, native translators can convey the literal tone of voice and word to word translation of brochures, campaigns, and websites. People use mobile devices to do chunk translations of related questions in order to sell their products globally. You will just translate complex sentences with the English language, nothing more than that. Websites using online translator tools and marketing tactics to get success can never achieve that pattern. Interlingual machine translation provides the quality of machine translation. There are some grammar rules which require the word translation of patterns in data. The meaning of standard language just had to be perceived well by the audience and an online translator should convey the literal word to word concept of the campaign. The same applies to the translations of personal documents and Global marketing tactics. Machine Translation software and digital tools are helping people out in many ways yet when it comes to specific documents, nothing can beat the human language translators. People require personal documents translation on their mobile devices without any word errors. Hybrid machine translation is also available in a deep approach translation but transfer-based machine translation is not of that quality as human translators.
Why human translators are better and have no word errors like a machine translator? Because they don’t function with the machine translation paradigm, they have their own natural target language processing. They don’t have to follow any machine learning algorithm. Machine translation tools are not preferred for global marketing as the machine will only translate the complex sentences with replacement. The objective reality of the campaign of the brand will not be fulfilled as it can be with a human translator. Machine translation software programs work by machine learning algorithms. Therefore, it is often hard with machine translation tools of statistical models to reach an organic audience. This is why human translators are more preferred.
The transfer-based machine translation industry rose to prominence in the early ’90s and reach the summit of popularity in the 2000’s when globalization took over. And now we have legal translators, technical translation experts, immigration translators, website translators and localization experts, medical translators, and that’s not all, we have native linguist experts too. Statistical methods of rule based machine translation are used for the language with corresponding and translation approaches. Suitable translation by human intervention of native speakers with depth knowledge can do original language translation with more output quality. Native translators are better than machine online translator. Statistical machine translation and google translate of target language source document do not have a better impact on the audience. Quality of Machine translation of the standard language of a certain culture is not what most brands require. Native speakers can do language pair with true meaning without copyright protection unlike artificial intelligence. One can assess the significance of human translators in contrast with machine translations with the fact that companies have interpreters and proofreaders to further refine the work of the translators, just to ensure that every translated project is completely error free.
